{"help": "https://uatweb.datansw.links.com.au/data/api/3/action/help_show?name=package_show", "success": true, "result": {"author": "Ryde City Council", "author_email": null, "contact_info": "False", "contact_point": "cityofryde@ryde.nsw.gov.au", "creator_user_id": "4709c2ae-f4fb-4ac9-9b4c-a53c668db28a", "data_state": "inactive", "id": "25a83b12-2e0b-4be8-9425-742d8621196f", "isopen": false, "jurisdiction": "New South Wales Government", "license_id": "lsba", "license_title": "Licence Specified by Agency", "maintainer": null, "maintainer_email": null, "metadata_created": "2022-02-02T22:30:35.458017", "metadata_modified": "2025-12-17T01:13:55.735275", "name": "fdp-eastwood-terrys-creek-floodplain-risk-management-study-plan-main-report-october-2009", "notes": "#Reasons for the Study and Plan\r\nFlooding problems within the Eastwood town centre and other areas within the Terry\u2019s Creek\r\ncatchment are well documented. Significant flooding problems have been experienced in\r\n1967, 1984 and 1989. It is estimated that over 70 houses or commercial properties\r\nexperienced above floor flooding in the November 1984 flood.\r\n\r\nA range of flood mitigation options were investigated some 17 years ago, in the Terry\u2019s\r\nCreek Catchment Management Study that was prepared for the Water Board. Since that\r\ntime, there have been a number of other studies with an emphasis largely on structural\r\noptions, including tunnelling, as a means of reducing Eastwood\u2019s flood problem. There have\r\nalso been various planning initiatives undertaken by Council which have imposed restrictions\r\non development because of the flood problems.\r\n\r\nIn May 2006, Bewsher Consulting was commissioned by the City of Ryde to assist its\r\nFloodplain Management Committee in preparing a Floodplain Management Study and Plan\r\nfor Eastwood and Terry\u2019s Creek.\r\n#Responsibilities\r\nThe prime responsibility for planning and management of flood prone lands in NSW rests\r\nwith local government. The NSW Government provides assistance on state-wide policy\r\nissues and technical support. Financial assistance is also provided to undertake flood and\r\nfloodplain risk management studies and for the implementation of works identified in any\r\nsubsequent floodplain risk management plan.\r\n\r\nThe Eastwood and Terry\u2019s Creek Floodplain Management Committee oversaw the Study.\r\nThis committee includes Councillors and staff from the City of Ryde, and staff from\r\nParramatta City Council, Hornsby Shire Council, Department of Environment, Climate\r\nChange and Water (DECCW), Sydney Water Corporation and the State Emergency Service\r\n(SES). A number of community representatives were also represented on the committee.\r\n#The Study Area\r\nThe study area, shown on Figure 1, includes that portion of Terry\u2019s Creek within the City of\r\nRyde, from Terry Road to the creek\u2019s confluence with the Lane Cove River.\r\nThe Eastwood town centre is located within the study area, and straddles the Main Northern\r\nRailway Line. In addition to the main creek, the study area includes all significant tributaries\r\nand many overland flow paths.\r\n\r\nSome consideration has also been given to works that have previously been recommended\r\nwithin Parramatta City Council, where these works potentially impact on flooding within the\r\nCity of Ryde. The potential for flooding of properties in Parramatta City Council and Hornsby\r\nShire Council has also been considered immediately upstream and downstream of the\r\nrailway crossing.\r\n#Reporting\r\nThe Study results have been presented in a number of reports as the study has progressed,\r\nincluding reports covering:\r\n\r\n* the Flood Study (May 2008);\r\n* Town Planning Considerations (July 2008); and the\r\n* Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan (this report).\r\n\r\nConsultation\r\nCommunity consultation has been an important component of the project. Key elements of\r\nthe consultation process have been as follows:\r\n\r\n* regular meetings of the Eastwood & Terry\u2019s Creek Floodplain Management\r\nCommittee;\r\n* public review of the flood study results, including a public display during July and\r\nAugust 2007, an information day and feedback process; and\r\n* public exhibition of the draft floodplain risk management study and plan, prior to formal\r\nconsideration by Council.\r\n#Modelling of Flood Behaviour\r\nFlood behaviour has been assessed using computer models. The catchment area and\r\nstormwater pipe network within the study area was modelled using the DRAINS hydrologic\r\nmodel. Catchment flows from the Parramatta and Hornsby Council portion of the catchment\r\nwere generated using a less detailed RAFTS model. Flows from these models were input to\r\na two dimensional TUFLOW hydraulic model to estimate flood depths and the extent of flood\r\ninundation.\r\n\r\nThe flood models were calibrated to the November 1984 flood. They were then used to\r\nsimulate flood behaviour for a range of flood events, including a 5 year, 10 year, 20 year, 50\r\nyear, 100 year and Probable Maximum Flood (PMF).\r\n#Flood Risk Mapping & Development Controls\r\nThe area subject to flooding (up to the PMF) has been divided into three flood risk precincts\r\n(high, medium and low). Different development controls are proposed for the catchment,\r\ndepending on the type of development and the flood risk precinct in which the development\r\nis located. The flood risk precincts comprise:\r\n\r\n* The high flood risk area \u2013 where high flood damages, potential risk to life, or\r\nevacuation problems are anticipated. It is recommended that most development is\r\nrestricted within this area.\r\n* The medium flood risk area \u2013 where there is still a significant risk of flood damage, but\r\nwhere these damages can be minimised by the application of appropriate\r\ndevelopment controls.\r\n* The low flood risk area \u2013 where the risk of flood damage is low. Most land uses would\r\nbe permitted within this area (subject to other planning considerations).\r\nIn addition to the flood risk precincts, an overland flow precinct has also been defined. This\r\ncomprises shallow areas of inundation distant from major watercourses where less\r\nrestrictive flood level and other controls apply.\r\n#The Flood Problem\r\nA flood damages database has been prepared for the study area to quantify the flood\r\nproblem and to assist in evaluating the economic merit of a range of flood mitigation\r\nmeasures.\r\n\r\nThe database includes details on 1,361 properties throughout the study area that could\r\npotentially be affected by flooding (up to a PMF flood). The database has further been\r\ndivided into 9 geographical areas (shown on Figure 1) to help identify the spatial distribution\r\nof the flood problem over the study area.\r\n\r\n#Flood Mitigation Options Investigated\r\nA total of 12 options were identified by the floodplain management committee for analysis.\r\nThese options were initially assessed using performance in the 100 year flood and\r\nconsideration of environmental and other factors. A short list of 6 options was identified for\r\nfurther economic assessment. An additional option for the Eastwood town centre was also\r\ninvestigated following the evaluation of these options. The options are shown in Table 3.\r\n\r\nThe short tunnel option looked at diverting flow from upstream of Terry Road through a 3.8m\r\ndiameter tunnel direct to a small basin in the lower part of Eastwood Park. The main\r\nobjective was to reduce the flow carried by Terry\u2019s Creek through the town centre. This\r\noption reduces flood levels through the town centre by 0.4 to 0.6m in a 100 year flood, and\r\nreduces the present value of all flood damage by $3.2M. However, flood levels downstream\r\nof the railway line increase marginally due to reduced travel times and results in an increase\r\nin flood damage of $0.4M. The net benefit is $2.8M and the estimated cost is $13M. This\r\noption is not favoured due to its poor benefit/cost ratio of 0.2 and the increase in\r\ndownstream flood levels.\r\n\r\nThe basin at Mobbs Lane and the culvert upgrade at Terry Road are two options that have\r\nbeen proposed in a report prepared for Parramatta City Council. Both options have been\r\nreviewed due to their potential impact on flood behaviour through the current study area.\r\n\r\nThe basin is likely to reduce flood levels whilst the culvert upgrade could potentially increase\r\nflood levels. Model results indicate a reduction in flood levels of 0.1 to 0.2m through\r\nEastwood in a 100 year flood due to the combined measures, but an increase of around\r\n0.1m in more frequent floods (5 year and 10 year events). This is due to the basin becoming\r\nless effective in smaller floods whilst the impact of the culvert upgrade became more\r\npronounced. It is recommended that a basin at Mobbs Lane be pursued with Parramatta City\r\nCouncil, with possible cost sharing arrangements between both Councils and the DECCW.\r\n\r\nAmplification of the Terry Road culvert can not be recommended without further\r\nconsideration of the impacts in smaller floods.\r\n\r\nDrainage improvements were investigated along Abuklea Road and in the vicinity of the TG\r\nMilner Sportsground. The initial scheme included doubling the size of the existing drainage\r\npipeline behind properties in Abuklea Road, but provided limited benefits. Further\r\nstormwater drainage improvements have been proposed for this area (see Table 4 for\r\npotential drainage improvements in this area and others).\r\n\r\nDebris control measures to prevent blockage of the railway culvert and the Progress Avenue\r\nculverts were investigated. The present value of all flood damage could be reduced by\r\napproximately $0.5M if the potential for blockage of these structures is eliminated. The\r\nmeasures are envisaged to incorporate bollards around the perimeter of the railway culvert, and structural fencing along the boundary of the open channel upstream of the Progress\r\nAvenue culverts. This measure has an estimated cost of the order of $50,000 and a\r\nbenefit/cost ratio considerably greater than 1.0. These works are recommended.\r\nThe final stage of a drainage augmentation scheme at First Avenue in the eastern town\r\ncentre was included in the flood model. Results indicated that flooding of a number of\r\ncommercial properties along Rowe Street could be alleviated by these works, with the\r\npresent value of all flood damages reduced by approximately $0.6M. The cost of the final\r\nstage of works has been estimated at $1.3M, which provides a benefit/cost ratio of 0.5. As\r\nthis is the final stage of a major drainage augmentation scheme, completion of this final\r\nstage is recommended.\r\n\r\nThe options recommended above only partially reduce flooding through the Eastwood town\r\ncentre. Further evaluation of drainage augmentation measures in this area was\r\nsubsequently undertaken. A scheme was identified including:\r\n\r\n* modification of the existing drain upstream of Progress Avenue, including the option to\r\ncover this drain;\r\n* new twin box culverts from Glen Street Reserve to Eastwood Park, under Lakeside\r\nRoad; and\r\n* an inlet headwall in Glen Street Reserve.\r\n\r\nThe drainage augmentation measures reduce the 100 year flood by up to 1.0 to 1.1m\r\nthrough the town centre, reducing the depth of flooding to less than 0.3m. The estimated\r\ncost is $8.5M, and the present value of flood benefits estimated at $4.6M. This provides a\r\nbenefit/cost ratio of 0.5, which is a substantial improvement over the other tunnel options\r\ninvestigated. Given the reduced risk to personal safety this option could be considered more\r\nfavourably. It would also remove many of the flooding constraints on future redevelopment of\r\nthe town centre. The option has been included in the recommended Floodplain Management\r\nPlan.\r\n#Stormwater Drainage Problems\r\nA large focus of the current study has been based on addressing the flood problems in the\r\nEastwood town centre. However, the total flood damage from this area represents only 30%\r\nof the flood damage experienced throughout the wider study area (based on the present\r\nvalue of flood damage in Table 2). Most of the other flooding problems are related to\r\nstormwater drainage and overland flow problems along the tributaries that lead to Terry\u2019s\r\nCreek.\r\nThe majority of flooding problems are related to surface flows that are less than 0.5m in\r\ndepth. Flood behaviour within these areas is very much influenced by local conditions,\r\nincluding fences, structures, the accuracy of the ALS survey, and assumed floor levels of\r\npotentially affected buildings. Further investigations will be required in several areas to\r\ndetermine the most appropriate stormwater drainage improvements.\r\nTable 4 lists some provisional stormwater drainage improvement measures. These works\r\nare subject to detailed assessments, but are anticipated to include:\r\n\r\n* formalisation of overland flow paths;\r\n* amplification of stormwater pipe lines; and\r\n* potential relocation of buildings that currently restrict overland flow paths.\r\n\r\nAdditional measures have been recommended for Area 7, including additional inlet pits in\r\nBrabyn Street, improvements to the culvert in Jim Walsh Park, and a feasibility study into a\r\npotential detention basin in Jim Walsh Park.\r\n\r\n#Planning Issues\r\nExisting planning controls related to flooding have been reviewed during the course of these\r\ninvestigations.\r\n\r\nA number of flood related controls have been proposed for the study area, which would be\r\nimplemented through a flood risk management chapter to be included in the City-wide DCP.\r\n\r\nThe DCP chapter outlines a common preamble, principles and objectives that would apply to\r\nall catchments within the City of Ryde. Specific controls for Eastwood and Terry\u2019s Creek, as\r\ndetermined during the course of the floodplain management study, are included in a matrix\r\nof prescriptive controls (included as Figure 2). Other matrices would be developed and\r\nappended to the DCP chapter as studies and plans on other catchments are completed.\r\n\r\nMany of the measures included in the proposed DCP chapter formalise procedures that are\r\ncurrently applied by officers from Council. Some changes that have been recommended\r\ninclude:\r\n\r\n* increase of freeboard from 0.3m to 0.5m (except in the overland flow precinct);\r\n* limited controls on residential development above the 100 year flood, to satisfy\r\nfreeboard allowance and vertical evacuation requirements;\r\n* more comprehensive car parking and driveway access requirements;\r\n* varying controls based on sensitivity of landuse to flood risk;\r\n* providing concessions to encourage existing floodprone properties to redevelop in a\r\nflood-sensitive manner.\r\n\r\nThe study has also recognised that there may be locations beyond the limit of the 100 year\r\nflood (plus freeboard) where controls on residential development may be required in some\r\nrare circumstances (eg basement carparks, vertical evacuation). In accordance with the\r\nDepartment of Planning\u2019s January 2007 Guideline, Council will need to seek approval from\r\nthe State Government to impose controls in this area.\r\n#The Recommended Floodplain Management Measures\r\nThe draft Eastwood and Terry\u2019s Creek Floodplain Risk Management Plan is shown on\r\nFigure 3 and summarised in Table 5.\r\n\r\nIt is important to note that not all flooding problems in the study area have been alleviated. A\r\ncomplete solution to the flooding problem is not cost effective from a floodplain management\r\nperspective. However, problems can be reduced gradually over time as sensible\r\nredevelopment occurs. There may also be some scope to completely alter the drainage\r\nregime through the town centre in association with major redevelopment proposals.\r\n#Timing and Funding\r\nThe total cost of implementing all the recommended measures is approximately $14.4M.\r\n\r\nThis includes an amount of $8.5M for drainage augmentation measures through the town\r\ncentre. It is envisaged that the Plan would be implemented progressively over a 5 to 10 year\r\ntime frame.\r\n\r\nThe timing of the proposed works will depend on the overall budgetary commitments of\r\nCouncil and the availability of funds from other sources (eg State Government, potential\r\nSection 94 contributions, private sector contributions etc).", "num_resources": 1, "num_tags": 2, "organization": {"id": "1763c56c-156b-4d33-befa-9df41bf150c1", "name": "ryde-city-council", "title": "Ryde City Council", "type": "organization", "description": "The City of Ryde is a local government area that services certain suburbs located within the Lower North Shore and Northern Suburbs of Sydney, NSW; proclaimed as the City of Ryde in 1992.\r\n\r\nThe local government area extends from the Parramatta River to the Lane Cove River which encircles the area in the north, and is bounded in the east by the peninsula of Hunters Hill and the City of Parramatta in the west.\r\nIt is 40.65km2 in area and home to over 117,170 people.  \r\n\r\nhttp://www.ryde.nsw.gov.au/Home\r\n\r\nCouncil has undertaken several studies on overland flow and localised flooding of Macquarie Park Catchment and the Eastwood and Terry\u2019s Creek Catchment\r\nhttp://www.ryde.nsw.gov.au/Business-and-Development/Planning-Controls/Other-Planning-Considerations/Flood-Prone-Areas", "image_url": "2021-03-23-013607.937443ryde.png", "created": "2021-03-04T09:34:55.967895", "is_organization": true, "approval_status": "approved", "state": "active"}, "owner_org": "1763c56c-156b-4d33-befa-9df41bf150c1", "private": false, "spatial": "{\r\n \"type\": \"Polygon\",\r\n \"coordinates\": [\r\n  [\r\n   [\r\n    151.08263554539008,\r\n    -33.786928175253244\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.08521046604437,\r\n    -33.786571500207344\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.08485941753312,\r\n    -33.78485266442109\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.08513235980354,\r\n    -33.784107192944326\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.08579583065875,\r\n    -33.78365313109191\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.08692707850423,\r\n    -33.783296442405046\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.08809738143464,\r\n    -33.78203196806261\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.08840937551577,\r\n    -33.78151297396578\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.08954105293378,\r\n    -33.780734659802214\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.0905941958481,\r\n    -33.780540255415126\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.09149155585328,\r\n    -33.78021601489474\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.09219407982891,\r\n    -33.77979439370293\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.09309101026156,\r\n    -33.77888621750587\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.09344248703562,\r\n    -33.778464946826155\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.09328627586365,\r\n    -33.77755676088779\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.0931691165024,\r\n    -33.7769407140495\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.09367637618558,\r\n    -33.77587055966939\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.09324722274323,\r\n    -33.77535152823894\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.09313049295451,\r\n    -33.77486531389549\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.09332532898406,\r\n    -33.774086939327525\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.09391069359844,\r\n    -33.773276093938954\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.09394974671886,\r\n    -33.77288689814213\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.0938325873576,\r\n    -33.772076041395934\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.0935596463969,\r\n    -33.77149241958139\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.09371542930603,\r\n    -33.770973718715396\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.094105529628,\r\n    -33.769968414939335\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.0945737361908,\r\n    -33.769935954279994\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.095237207046,\r\n    -33.76944935210667\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.09609551393075,\r\n    -33.768444030990054\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.09671950340268,\r\n    -33.766919619922085\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.09609551393075,\r\n    -33.76617363526566\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.09605646081036,\r\n    -33.76594673566436\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.09648561425274,\r\n    -33.76546011083762\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.09808506866102,\r\n    -33.76584934036897\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.098475168983,\r\n    -33.76555751093038\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.098475168983,\r\n    -33.764357705223176\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.10140113683883,\r\n    -33.76231446818285\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.10198650276288,\r\n    -33.76208720123801\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.10261092049768,\r\n    -33.76293062018806\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.10296196769923,\r\n    -33.76322246292684\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.1038593277044,\r\n    -33.76293062018806\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.1044052109355,\r\n    -33.7623790468487\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.10479574083,\r\n    -33.76173042275549\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.10538067718153,\r\n    -33.761276599424995\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.10752644439344,\r\n    -33.761892758891264\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.1095941066742,\r\n    -33.762671243689816\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.10854053418734,\r\n    -33.764714472224654\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.10151786662755,\r\n    -33.77168755214262\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.10167407779954,\r\n    -33.772757758775796\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.10210323255157,\r\n    -33.777686958760526\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.10284480964765,\r\n    -33.77995704940354\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.10514635845902,\r\n    -33.78478845754774\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.1038979512523,\r\n    -33.785729025847296\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.10277528699953,\r\n    -33.78628472991127\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.09942016570127,\r\n    -33.78719282330215\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.09801597427577,\r\n    -33.79231592876508\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.0964555729879,\r\n    -33.79575184478885\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.09528484375914,\r\n    -33.79640092091942\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.09497327794088,\r\n    -33.79737310232413\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.0910714129568,\r\n    -33.79575184478885\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.08912048308412,\r\n    -33.79575184478885\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.08802785747682,\r\n    -33.79529820167378\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.08623313746648,\r\n    -33.79484454744759\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.08428306411952,\r\n    -33.793676896132865\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.08342475723475,\r\n    -33.79341797025903\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.08209781552432,\r\n    -33.79354779464246\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.07991342476453,\r\n    -33.7949094585822\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.07952289487002,\r\n    -33.796271100862896\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.07741661035106,\r\n    -33.79685455819062\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.0742949479754,\r\n    -33.797827448397435\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.07234487462847,\r\n    -33.79724328374205\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.0710179322632,\r\n    -33.79510346900661\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.07039394279127,\r\n    -33.79348216848478\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.0708617210912,\r\n    -33.791731724320826\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.06976995397417,\r\n    -33.79166681948412\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.0678190227918,\r\n    -33.79114824078445\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.0663367264351,\r\n    -33.79095350738476\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.07569999658153,\r\n    -33.78855388081502\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.07515325420536,\r\n    -33.78719210925912\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.0787426942261,\r\n    -33.78719210925912\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.08209867335972,\r\n    -33.7885538786381\r\n   ],\r\n   [\r\n    151.08263554539008,\r\n    -33.786928175253244\r\n   ]\r\n  ]\r\n ]\r\n}", "spatial_coverage": "New South Wales (NSW81093)", "state": "active", "temporal_coverage_to": "2009-10-01", "title": "Eastwood & Terrys Creek Floodplain Risk Management Study & Plan Main Report", "type": "dataset", "unpublished": "false", "update_freq": "as_required", "url": "", "version": null, "extras": [{"key": "fdp_type", "value": "related-dataset"}, {"key": "harvest_portal", "value": "Flood Data Portal"}, {"key": "harvest_url", "value": "https://uatweb.fdp.links.com.au/related-dataset/eastwood-terrys-creek-floodplain-risk-management-study-plan-main-report-october-2009"}], "groups": [{"description": "The function of [land and resource management](http://search.records.nsw.gov.au/functions/10) includes the administration of crown land and the process of alienation, including surveying, mapping, and the preparation of leases and titles. The function also includes the zoning of land for a variety of purposes (residential, commercial, agricultural, mining, native title, parks and gardens, etc.) and the siting of major projects such as the Darling Harbour Authority. \r\n\r\nThe term also covers the management of resources such as water, soil and forests with the aim of ensuring that exploitation and use are balanced by policies and practices aimed at sustaining and preserving the resource for future generations.", "display_name": "Land and Resource Management", "id": "a160173c-b6d2-4696-9da9-3d3f71242672", "image_display_url": "https://uatweb.datansw.links.com.au/data/uploads/group/2025-02-21-012512.274219nswgpictogramlinesurveyorblue01.png", "name": "land-and-resource-management", "title": "Land and Resource Management"}], "resources": [{"cache_last_updated": null, "cache_url": null, "created": "2025-12-17T01:13:55.763049", "datastore_active": false, "datastore_contains_all_records_of_source_file": false, "format": "", "hash": "", "id": "b0a177e1-b265-4067-9192-f5f6e8d417ef", "last_modified": null, "metadata_modified": "2025-12-17T01:13:55.744505", "mimetype": null, "mimetype_inner": null, "name": "Eastwood & Terrys Creek Floodplain Risk Management Study & Plan - Main Report October 2009", "package_id": "25a83b12-2e0b-4be8-9425-742d8621196f", "position": 0, "resource_type": null, "size": null, "state": "active", "tracking_summary": {"total": 0, "recent": 0}, "url": "https://uatweb.fdp.links.com.au/dataset/4809986c-dda0-4bb7-84be-a094778d43dd/resource/790fb11c-19c1-4918-8d9c-e2f997988688", "url_type": null}], "tags": [{"display_name": "Eastwood", "id": "ed7da17d-7bf6-44d2-9422-9eef70ed6798", "name": "Eastwood", "state": "active", "vocabulary_id": null}, {"display_name": "Terrys Creek", "id": "4212d8e8-39b7-49bf-8e7f-fb5dba67f5b7", "name": "Terrys Creek", "state": "active", "vocabulary_id": null}], "relationships_as_subject": [], "relationships_as_object": [], "likes": 0, "tracking_summary": {"total": 0, "recent": 0}}}